Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR9613 14
Original file (NR9613 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001
ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490

HD
Docket No. NR9613-14

af =. 1 mae
aa owe was y avi

From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
To; Secretary of the Navy

a

 

REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD

Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. 1552

Encl: (1) DD Form 149 dtd 3 Aug 14 w/attachments .
(2) NOSC Columbus ltr dtd 10 Feb 15 -

1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject,
hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this
Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be
corrected by removing the service record page 13 (“Administrative

Remarks") entry dated 5 June 2022 (copy at Tab A).

2. the Board, consisting of Messrs. Ii

reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on

1S February 2015, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that
the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the
available evidence of record. Documentary material considered by
the Board consisted of the enclosures, and applicable statutes,

regulations and policies.

3, The Board, having reviewed all-the facts of record pertaining
to Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice, finds as follows:

a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all
administrative remedies available under existing law and regulations
within the Department of the Navy.

b. In enclosure (2), the Commander, Navy Operational Support
Center Columbus has recommended removing the contested entry.
CONCLUSION:

Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and
especially in light of enclosure (2), the Board finds the existence
of an injustice warranting the following corrective action.

RECOMMENDATION:

a. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected by removing the
service record page 13 (“Administrative Remarks”) entry dated 5 June
2012,

b. That any material or entries inconsistent with or relating
to the Board's recommendation be corrected, removed or completely
expunged from Petitioner's record and that no such entries or
material be added to the record in the future.

4. Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised Procedures of the Board
for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations,
Section 723.6(c)) it is certified that a quorum was present at the
Board’s review and deliberations, and that the foregoing is a true
and complete record of the Board's proceedings in the above entitled
matter.

. Doethi dé, frlrrn

JONATHAN S. RUSKIN
Recorder

5, Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6 (e)
of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval Records
(32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6 (e)) and having assured
compliance with its provisions, it is hereby announced that the
foregoing corrective action taken under the authority of reference
(a), has been approved by the Board on behalf of the Secretary of
the Navy.

ROBERT J. O'NEILL
Executive Director

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 03374-08

    Original file (03374-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    3374-08 17 July 2008 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: ¢ Secretary of the Navy REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. Subject, filed enclosure (1) with that the applicable naval e service record page 11 (a) entry dated 2 February 2008, a 2. That any material or entries inconsistent with or relating to the Board's recommendation be corrected, removed or completely expunged from Petitioner's record and that no such entries or material be added to the record in the future.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR7703 14

    Original file (NR7703 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    NR7703-14 9 April 2015 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: ; _ ra REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD Ref: (a} 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 11 (“Administrative Remarks (1970)”} entry dated 16 January 2009. k copy of the contested entry is at...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR7373 14

    Original file (NR7373 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 11 (“Administrative Remarks (1070)”") entry dated 21 June 2012 (copy at Tab A). 2, The Board, consisting cf =} iis MMMM, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 29 January 2015, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 03933-09

    Original file (03933-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed written application, enclosure (1), with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 11A (“Administrative Remarks (1070)”) entry dated 16 October 2008, reflecting assignment of a reenlistment code of “RE-30 [refused orders assigned without sufficient obligated service remaining].” A copy of this entry is in enclosure (1) at Tab A. ...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 00700-09

    Original file (00700-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board, consisting of Ms. Colbert and Messrs. Storz and Tew, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 2 April 2009, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. c. In correspondence attached as enclosure (4), the HOMC office having cognizance over the subject matter of Petitioner’s request to remove the service record page llb entry has commented to the effect that this...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 01920-10

    Original file (01920-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed written application, enclosure (1), with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 11 (“Administrative Remarks (1070)”) entry dated 20 March 2008, a copy of which is at Tab A. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Grover, Ivins and McBride, reviewed allegations of error and injustice on 1 July 2010, and pursuant to its regulations,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 06823-10

    Original file (06823-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed written application, enclosure (1), with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 11 (a) (“Administrative Remarks (1070)") entry dated 19 September 2005, a copy of which is at Tab A, and the five Entrance National Agency Check (ENTNAC) documents in the Service-Contract folder of his Official Military Personnel File (OMPF), images...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR4525 13

    Original file (NR4525 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 11 (“Administrative Remarks (1070)”) entry dated 9 September 2011, a copy of which is at Tab A. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Boyd, Genteman and Spain, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 17 April 2014, and pursuant to its...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR9378 14

    Original file (NR9378 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 7015. Pursuant to the provisions of reference {a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 11 (“Administrative Remarks (1070)") entry dated 30 March 2005. That any material or entries inconsistent with or relating to the Board's recommendation be corrected, removed or...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2570 14

    Original file (NR2570 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board, consisting of Messrs. Chapman, Koman and Spain, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on & January 2015, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. CONCLUSION: Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and especially in light of the contents of enclosures (4) and (5), the Board finds the existence of an error and injustice warranting the following...